%
CapRateCity
Free cap rate calculators for every US market
← All comparisons

Worcester vs New Bedford for Rental Property Investing

Side-by-side comparison of Worcester, MA and New Bedford, MA — cap rates, rent, prices, and investment metrics.

Worcester wins 4–3 across key metrics
New Bedford leads on cash flow (3.40% vs 3.33% cap rate) · Worcester leads on population growth
Metric
Worcester, MA
New Bedford, MA
Est. Cap Rate
3.33%
3.40%
Median Home Price
$355,000
$310,000
Median Monthly Rent
$1,650
$1,480
1% Rule
0.46%
0.48%
GRM
17.9x
17.5x
Price / Income
6.8x
7.7x
Property Tax Rate
1.18%
1.2%
Vacancy Rate
4.8%
5.8%
Population Growth
0.6% / yr
0.2% / yr
Annual Appreciation
3%
2.8%
Population
206,518
101,000
Median Income
$52,400
$40,200

Worcester vs New Bedford: Which Is Better for Investors?

Cash flow: New Bedford has the edge with an estimated cap rate of 3.40% compared to Worcester's 3.33%. Neither city passes the 1% rule outright, so deal sourcing and value-add strategies become more important. Median home prices are $355,000 in Worcester vs $310,000 in New Bedford, while rents come in at $1,650/mo and $1,480/mo respectively.

Growth & appreciation: Worcester is growing faster at 0.6% annually vs New Bedford's 0.2%. Worcester leads on home value appreciation at 3% per year.

Costs & risk: Property taxes are 1.18% in Worcester vs 1.2% in New Bedford. Vacancy rates of 4.8% and 5.8% are both healthy, suggesting strong tenant demand in both markets.

Bottom line: Worcester edges out New Bedford on most key metrics. While cap rates are moderate at 3.33%, Worcester's overall profile is stronger. Use our free calculators to model specific deals in Worcester or New Bedford.

Worcester, MA
3.33% cap rate · $355,000 median · $1,650/mo
Full analysis →
New Bedford, MA
3.40% cap rate · $310,000 median · $1,480/mo
Full analysis →
The CapRateCity Report
Weekly market analysis: highest cap rate cities, emerging markets, and deal breakdowns. Free, no spam.