%
CapRateCity
Free cap rate calculators for every US market
← All comparisons

Chicago vs Naperville for Rental Property Investing

Side-by-side comparison of Chicago, IL and Naperville, IL — cap rates, rent, prices, and investment metrics.

Naperville wins 4–3 across key metrics
Chicago leads on cash flow (3.03% vs 2.29% cap rate) · Naperville leads on population growth
Metric
Chicago, IL
Naperville, IL
Est. Cap Rate
3.03%
2.29%
Median Home Price
$310,000
$440,000
Median Monthly Rent
$1,620
$1,950
1% Rule
0.52%
0.44%
GRM
15.9x
18.8x
Price / Income
5.0x
3.7x
Property Tax Rate
2.08%
2%
Vacancy Rate
5.8%
4.2%
Population Growth
0.1% / yr
0.5% / yr
Annual Appreciation
2.4%
2.5%
Population
2,665,039
150,000
Median Income
$62,400
$118,000

Chicago vs Naperville: Which Is Better for Investors?

Cash flow: Chicago has the edge with an estimated cap rate of 3.03% compared to Naperville's 2.29%. Neither city passes the 1% rule outright, so deal sourcing and value-add strategies become more important. Median home prices are $310,000 in Chicago vs $440,000 in Naperville, while rents come in at $1,620/mo and $1,950/mo respectively.

Growth & appreciation: Naperville is growing faster at 0.5% annually vs Chicago's 0.1%. Naperville leads on home value appreciation at 2.5% per year.

Costs & risk: Property taxes are 2.08% in Chicago vs 2% in Naperville. Vacancy rates of 5.8% and 4.2% are both healthy, suggesting strong tenant demand in both markets.

Bottom line: Naperville edges out Chicago on most key metrics. While cap rates are moderate at 2.29%, Naperville's overall profile is stronger. Use our free calculators to model specific deals in Chicago or Naperville.

Chicago, IL
3.03% cap rate · $310,000 median · $1,620/mo
Full analysis →
Naperville, IL
2.29% cap rate · $440,000 median · $1,950/mo
Full analysis →
The CapRateCity Report
Weekly market analysis: highest cap rate cities, emerging markets, and deal breakdowns. Free, no spam.